Showing posts with label Iron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iron. Show all posts

Modern Tests Demonstrate Soundness Of Old Iron Bridge

An unusual bowstring truss iron bridge that carried traffic across Roaring Run in Bedford County, Va. for almost 100 years is now a picturesque footbridge at the I-81 Ironto, Va. rest stop. Built in 1878, it is the oldest standing metal bridge in Virginia. In early December, a Virginia Tech undergraduate conducted a load-bearing analysis of the structure.

It may have been the first such test on the bridge. "There was no documentation of a structural analysis from when the bridge was designed," said Elaine Huffman of Bowie, Md., a student in civil engineering. As part of her research project, she did a historical survey of the bridge through a literature review, developed a computer-based structural analysis, and recently verified the computer model with an actual load test.

The bowstring truss design was patented by Z. King in 1859 under the name "Tubular Arch Bridge," Huffman learned. When the bridge was bypassed by a pipe culvert in the 1970s, it began to fall into disrepair. "The Virginia Transportation Research Council recognized the importance of the bridge as a historical landmark and worked to preserve it by restoring it and putting it into use elsewhere," said Huffman. "Much work was put into determining the original paint scheme and recreating it once the bridge was relocated. The new site was selected to maintain the function of the bridge." Huffman noted a number of unique features of the wrought iron bridge. For example, "there is a unique bracing system perpendicular to the truss that restrains lateral movement of the arch," she said. "Cross braces prevent longitudinal motion of the bridge deck as it hangs from the vertical cables."

In her computer model stress analysis, Huffman applied three different loads, two of them from the era of iron bridges. One test came from the 1893 Practical Treatise on the Construction of Iron Highway Bridges, which suggested that a uniform distributed load of 75 pounds per square foot (psf) be applied to ordinary country bridges 60 feet and shorter to represent a typical load. For a vehicular point load, the 1898 work, De Prontibus, suggested using a six-foot by eight-foot wagon load of five tons distributed equally between all four wheels. The third load was representative of the three-ton truck that would be used in the load test.

The deflected shape of the truss with the 3.5-ton wagon load was the same as the five-ton wagon load, Huffman determined. The uniform load created the highest stresses and highest deflections. "Generally, stresses are limited in a modern bridge design to 60 percent of the yield stress in service," Huffman said. "But in its current location, the bridge will most likely never see such high stresses because pedestrian traffic over it is neither constant nor high enough."

On December 3, Huffman carried out a load test to verify the accuracy of the computer model. Dial gages, which turn small linear movements into readable increments on a dial, were set up below the center of each truss. Then, a truck weighing three tons was driven across the bridge, pausing every five feet to record the deflection. "The bridge behaved as expected for the most part. The maximum deflection recorded for one truss was 0.14 inches, 70 percent of the result predicted by the model. However, the second truss deflected a smaller amount," Huffman said. "Preliminary analysis suggests that the diagonal cable members have loosened over time and are supporting the bridge loads unevenly, allowing one truss to deflect more than the other,"

The results from this test will be contributed to the Adaptive Bridge Use Project based at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and supported by the National Science Foundation (www.ecs.umass.edu/adaptive_bridge_use/). The program aims to restore and study historic bridges to enhance structural engineering curriculum and preserve examples of bridge designs from the past, said Huffman's advisor, Cris Moen, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering. The Ironto Wayside footbridge, the last remaining bowstring arch-truss in the state, is a significant landmark in Virginia. "It is useful to study historic landmarks, as they can guide us in the design of future structures," said Huffman.

Her computer model can be used as an example for creating structural models to test other bridges, said Moen. "Perhaps the analysis will aid in the future assessment of the bridge's condition as it continues to be preserved as a historic landmark," said Huffman.

Lifebatt Launches Lithium Iron Phosphate Modules

Lifebatt has extended its range with the introduction of eight modules: four assembled using the X-1E 3.3V 10Ah and four using the X-2E 3.3V 15Ah high-energy cell. This module range is available in four voltages, 12V, 24V, 36V and 48V, configurations with capacity ranging from 10Ah to 180Ah and is specifically designed for high-energy applications with a maximum continuous discharge current of 30A, with peaks of 50A.

This range offers high performance, improved cost of ownership, cycle life of 2,000 cycles and lower environmental footprint when compared to other traditional batteries, according to Lifebatt. Stand-alone renewable energy sources and UPS systems are becoming increasingly popular in a wide variety of applications and require a high-quality, long-life and low-maintenance battery solution. This is a particular requirement in remote locations where uncontrolled temperature variations and sometimes erratic shallow discharges are common.

Lead acid batteries and technologies based on nickel batteries can suffer from limited life, poor reliability, sudden death and high maintenance costs when compared to a LifePO4 solution, said Lifebatt. The range of LifePO4 modules available from Lifebatt have been specifically designed and developed to reduce the cost of ownership offering a life of more than five years in mobility applications. This is due to the modules being capable of offering a cycle life of 2,000 cycles based upon a 1C charge and discharge with the capacity reducing to just 80 per cent of the batteries original nominal capacity.

The design and production of all Lifebatt modules is achieved using components with a minimal impact upon the environment containing no heavy metals such as lead, nickel, cadmium or cobalt. At end of life 100 per cent of the components used can be collected and recycled and correspondingly meet all aspects of the Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators. The modules have also been designed to be configured to provide multiple voltages and capacities by allowing them to be connected in series and parallel as per customer requirements.